Recruitment

Self-service policy answers for the whole team

An HR team could use a private AI assistant grounded in the staff handbook to answer the routine policy questions that currently fill their inbox.

HR team of 1-5 A couple of months to value

The challenge

HR fields the same questions about leave, expenses, sickness, parental leave and benefits every week, often as Teams DMs that go unanswered overnight and create avoidable frustration.

The approach

1Ground a private AI assistant on the approved staff handbook and policy library.
2Make it available in Teams or the intranet so it sits where staff already are.
3Provide citations on every answer so staff can verify and HR can audit.
4Auto-create a ticket for HR when the assistant is not confident enough to answer.

Potential outcome

Faster answers for staff at the moment they need them.
HR inbox volume materially reduced.
Clearer visibility of the questions actually being asked.

Tools used

Private LLM with retrieval Policy document library Teams or intranet integration

How a sensible pilot could look

The fastest way to test a use case like this is a tightly scoped 30-day pilot rather than an open-ended rollout. The shape we recommend in almost every UK SMB is the same: one workflow, one owner, one success metric, one decision date. The point is to learn quickly and cheaply, not to transform the business in month one.

In week one, map the current workflow end to end and time it. This baseline is non-negotiable - without it, you can't tell whether the AI made things better, worse, or about the same. In week two, set up the tool and train two or three people deeply rather than rolling it out widely. In week three, run the new workflow alongside the old one and capture friction in writing. In week four, review the data, decide go or no-go, and write up what you learned.

Even a no-go is a successful pilot if you understand why. The worst outcome is a 'maybe' that drags on for another month and quietly absorbs the budget.

What to watch out for

Picking too broad a workflow. Narrow it until it almost feels too small - you can always widen later.
Skipping the baseline. If you don't know what 'before' looked like, you'll argue about whether 'after' is better.
Removing the human review too early. Almost every successful AI rollout in an SMB keeps a person on the final decision for far longer than the vendor suggests.
Letting the success metric become a feeling. 'The team likes it' is not a metric. Time saved, error rate, response time, conversion - pick something measurable.
Pasting client or customer data into a public tool. Use the approved one, or don't paste it at all.

Questions worth asking before you start

Who owns this? Not a steering group - one named person whose job it is to make this work, with the authority to change the workflow rather than just observe it.
What does success look like in numbers? Pick one metric, write it down on day one, and don't change it mid-pilot.
What data is the AI allowed to see? Be explicit about what's in scope, what's out of scope, and where outputs are stored. Document it before the pilot starts, not after.
What happens at day 30? Diary the go / no-go meeting now. Invite the people who can actually decide, not just the people who'll be in the room anyway.

Free assessment

Not sure if this is the right use case for you?

Take our 3-minute AI Opportunities assessment and get a tailored shortlist of the highest-impact use cases for your recruitment business - based on how you actually work today.

Start the assessment About 3 minutes - no email required

More Recruitment use cases